Laurel & Hardy

58. Beau Hunks (1931)

Filming began July 15, 1931 to August 11, 1931

Released December 12, 1931,   Four Reels

Produced by Hal Roach, Directed by James W. Horne, Sound by Elmer Raguse

Main Cast: Stan Laurel, Oliver Hardy, Charles Middleton, James W. Horne

Beau Hunks renamed Beau Chumps in the UK, is a unique film in the Laurel & Hardy canon, and whilst it’s the first time we see the boys join the Foreign Legion and the first time we see them placed in desert forts, fighting against sandstorms and opposing forces, these factors are not what give the film its uniqueness. The reason Beau Hunks is unlike any of the boys’ other films is simply its length.

The success of Stan and Babe’s pictures up to this point and also that of the Laurel and Hardy team more generally, had been built upon their gag-packed two-reelers. The boys had already ventured sporadically into three-reelers, in pictures such as The Laurel-Hardy Murder Case and Chickens Come Home as they would again over the next few years, and in addition, they’d also released their first feature-length movie, Pardon Us. The boys’ brand of two-reel comedy seemed to lend itself well to an extra reel and with the features like Pardon Us and the others that would follow, arguably crafted in such a way, with more developed plot lines, sub-plots, and song and dance numbers, they were set-up to carry the pictures effectively to five and even six reels. Beau Hunks, on the other hand, ran to four reels which was an unusual and yet very telling decision on behalf of the Roach studios and more so of Hal Roach himself.

As it transpired the people that profited the most financially from Beau Hunks were the theatre owners. The extra pulling power of advertising an extended length, featurette-style Laurel and Hardy comedy was perfect for the box-office, but as Hal Roach himself, as quoted in Randy Skretvedt’s The Magic Behind the Movies, explained:

“It was already sold as a two-reeler; we couldn’t get any more dough out of all the circuits because they’d already bought it…But it was just one of those things; it was intended to be a two-reel comedy, but it just kept getting funnier, and it ended up as a four-reeler. And it was so good that we didn’t want to cut it…”

Incredible then that, despite knowing that he would lose money on Beau Hunks, Roach still allowed it to be made and released as a four-reeler, simply because he wanted the product to be the best that it could be, regardless of the ultimate financial consequence. This appears to have been an attitude that was beginning to catch on across the various studios producing short comedies at that time and for a very good reason.

In an attempt to combat the growing popularity of the double-feature exhibit at theatres, a trend that was making it difficult for producers and distributors of short subjects to sell their wares, a number of the large studios were either testing the viability of or seriously considering the production of extended short films, to three and four reels. On December 12th, 1931, Motion Picture Herald reported that Educational, Columbia, and MGM all had “definite plans for the production of three and four reel shorts“, while several other smaller studios were planning to introduce them in the following 1932-33 season. Others, such as Universal held high-level talks but decided to hold off production until further study of the demands for extended shorts had been completed.

Mack Sennett had been given instructions, or perhaps permission, by the top brass at Educational, to proceed with the production of six, extended-length shorts, starting with an Andy Clyde picture. But, the Hal Roach Studios led the way with an agreement already in existence between Roach and his distributor, MGM. In the same article MGM Short Subject Sales Manager, Fred Quimby highlighted the fact that “already four of eight Charlie Chase comedies have been three reelers, two of eight Boy Friend comedies have run to three reels, and four of eight Laurel and Hardy’s have run in excess of two reels, with their latest, “Beau Hunks,” running four reels.”

Previously, production companies had tried to legally challenge the spread of the double feature but realised that the uncertainty surrounding the legality of their claims would make any attempts difficult, to say the least. Thus, the scramble between studios to produce extended shorts was their attempt to tackle the growing problem of falling sales, due to the “encroachment of double features on short subject sales”.

For Roach, at least, there was a certain level of success from their efforts. Beau Hunks was indeed embraced by exhibitors and used as a second feature on many double-feature bills and audiences responded. Contemporary reviews for the film were very positive, with many reviewers describing it as ‘A Wow!‘ and ‘One of their funniest comedies yet!‘. Photoplay Magazine called it “Rare Stuff…better than most features” and if anybody on the Roach team still needed reassurance, it was surely provided by this commentator in the Fort Lauderdale News, January 13, 1932, who wrote:

“Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy, Hal Roach’s stout and slim comedy team, who have achieved outstanding popularity in the comedy field during the last couple of years as a result of their delightful characterizations in two reel comedies, are with us again…Fortunately extra length is no handicap to this pair for the longer their picture, the more laughs to laugh at.”

Yet, whilst audiences evidently flocked to see the picture and contemporary reviewers were generally upbeat about it, the boys’ more modern reviewers and chroniclers haven’t been as positive. Simon Louvish, in Stan and Ollie: The Roots of Comedy, claims that the temporary change in director for Beau Hunks, from James Parrott to James Horne was responsible for a “dip” in standard and meant it stood apart from Laurel and Hardy’s “masterpieces” from the same period. Author William K. Everson,  writing in The Complete Films of Laurel & Hardy, wrote of Beau Hunks, “Four reels was a clumsy length for Laurel & Hardy, and they never repeated it. It was not long enough to allow for a story line or to justify worthwhile production values, and at the same time it was far too long for loosely-connected slapstick.” 

Whilst Everson’s first point may be valid, I would argue that the production values of the film were as high as could be expected, if not a little higher. Illustrating this point, The Lincoln Journal Star, August 5th, 1931 ran a story entitled, “Even Comedies Are True To Details” and in it stated:

“…In order to insure [sic] correct military procedure in ‘Beau Hunks’ the studio has engaged one Louis Van de Necker, (ex-legionnaire and World war veteran) to play the part of a corporal in the story.

All the uniforms have been carefully patterned after originals. More than two hundred and fifty regulation Labelle French foreign legion rifles have been imported to use in the film. And even the medals and honor citations worn by the soldiers are exact replicas of those awarded legionnaires for gallantry.

All this work and care should result in a correct and authentic foreign legion background…”  

Nevertheless, despite the film earning lukewarm reviews from more recent historians, one only has to consult the online army of Blog-Heads and the wider Laurel and Hardy fan community to understand that Beau Hunks is still certainly well loved, with plenty of fans naming it as one of their all-time favourites.

The film opens with a wonderful sequence of Ollie sitting at his piano, romantically singing “You Are the Ideal of My Dreams“. It’s a beautifully accomplished rendition and showcases Babe Hardy’s tenor voice to perfection. This is something that I wish could have been used more in the boys’ films, as whenever he sings, it’s usually one of the highlights of any film.

Mr. Hardy’s biographer, John McCabe tells us that Babe loved to sing. As a child with a “strikingly good soprano” voice, young Norvell ran away from his home in Milledgeville, to join a travelling troupe of entertainers for a short while, before returning to the bosom of his family home and his mother’s home cooking. His dream of singing and performing on stage soon returned though, and in his teenage years he got a job at the Milledgeville Opera House, where he would act as a stand-in, should any of the entertainers fall sick or not show up. Norvell’s ‘stand-in’ performances always ended with him signing the same song, “You Are the Ideal of My Dreams“.

Although it’s this song that we hear Ollie singing during the opening of the film, the original cut had him singing two songs. According to Glenn Mitchell’s Laurel & Hardy Encyclopedia, on Roach’s re-issuing of Beau Hunks in 1937, Ollie’s first number, ‘Pagan Love Song‘, was removed, along with the opening title card, due to objections based on the censorship regulations of the strict ‘Hays Code’, introduced in 1934. This was not the film’s only casualty of the Hays censorship police, as Simon Louvish explains, offence was also taken at a line in the film, “The Legion is hell on earth and in heaven” and so that too was removed.

Ollie’s romantic number ends with a dreamily self-satisfied sigh and after some subtle questioning from Stan; “What are you getting so mushy about?“, we learn that Ollie is going to be married to the “sweetest girl in the world“.

The romantic mood is soon shattered though, along with Ollie’s heart, as a letter arrives informing Ollie that his fiancee loves another man and that it’s best they never see each other again. A photograph of the girl in question, “Jeanie’Weanie“, is none other than starlet, Jean Harlow, in a portrait taken at the time of the filming of Double Whoopee.  

Hal Roach had spotted Jean Harlow’s potential and gave the young wannabee actress’s career a kick start, casting her in roles in three Laurel & Hardy shorts, Liberty, Double Whoopee, and Bacon Grabbers. It wouldn’t be the last time her likeness appeared in the boys’ films, however, as a photograph of her, as well as in Beau Hunks, can be also be seen on the mantlepiece in Brats.  Harlow always remembered Hal Roach’s kindness and the help that he gave her with her career, giving the producer her permission to use the photos.

In conversation with author Craig Calman and noted in his book, 100 Years of Brodies with Hal Roach, Hal Roach said of Beau Hunks that, “I think that is my favorite Laurel and Hardy picture…I had the cheapest leading lady in that one, by the way…Jean Harlow was a friend of mine, and we used only her photograph as the girl that jilts Babe”.

Ollie can’t bear the suffering caused by Jeanie-Weenie and so he decides that the only course of action is for both he and Stan to join the Foreign Legion and escape to a place where he can forget! This becomes a running gag throughout the picture as almost every man they come across is brokenhearted over the same girl and keeps her photograph as their secretly treasured possessions.

From here, the main purpose of the picture seems to be to parody the then-popular Foreign Legion/Beau Geste (1926) style films. The boys, as you would expect get into plenty of unintentional trouble with the fiery Commandant, played wonderfully by Charles Middleton. Middleton, best known perhaps for his portrayal of Ming the Merciless in the Flash Gordon serials of the mid-thirties,  would reprise his role of the Commandant eight years later in the feature-length, The Flying Deuces, which is, to all intents and purposes, a straight forward remake of Beau Hunks.

According to an article in Boys Cinema, dated 12th September 1932, a hundred and fifty members of the Hollywood American Legion were recruited to act as soldiers and also double as the desert Riff Army. The same article also suggests that the filming for the desert scenes took place at a resort called Hermosa Beach in Calfornia, whereas a letter dated October 2nd, 1962 written by Stan Laurel to fan, Tom Sefton, stated:

“Re “Beau Hunks” film, the marching & sand storm scenes were made in El Segundo (the Sand Dunes) it was difficult to shoot, had to avoid telegraph poles & the many ‘Shacks’ etc… The Arab Chief who attacked “Fort Arid” was played by Jimmy Horn the director, the original fellow was a very bad actor, after several rehearsals, Jimmy Horn decided to play the part himself – I thought he did a very good performance.”

Randy Skretvedt has provided some clarity on this by confirming the actual shooting location as the Palisades Del Rey dunes, which are located about 9 miles north of Hermosa Beach.

The picture is full of great gags and lines of dialogue throughout. From the “Mr. Levity” scene and Ollie demolishing the piano at the beginning, to the arrival at the fort, where Stan fails to call out his line-up number and when pushed for it, he gives the Commandant his telephone number “Hollywood 4368“. Then there are also scenes such as Ollie massaging Stan’s foot, thinking it’s his own, and his confused face when he looks down and sees three legs is just fantastic. There’s the march through the desert, where the boys fall down a large sand dune and skittle the commanding officer, before becoming lost in a huge sandstorm.

If making films that are funny is not difficult enough, the nature of the boys’ slapstick humour, being so physical at times, added an extra dimension of demands on the actors, and the desert scenes in Beau Hunks make this film no exception.  Stan Laurel, as we know, took every aspect of his craft incredibly seriously, an aspect which is born out by the following article published in the Shamokin News Dispatch on 17th December, 1931:

“Hard work has its effect on everyone so Stan Laurel prepared for the strenuous activity in “Beau Hunks,” the latest Laurel and Hardy comedy, by engaging a masseur to whip him into shape.  The masseur over-enthusiastic and determined to make good, worked so hard on the little comic that Stan, who only wanted his circulation snapped up, was really sick for two days. He hobbled about the Hal Roach Studios telling everybody he got that way trying to improve his health.” 

The final sequence of the boys foiling the raid on Fort Arid by the cartoonish Riff army is entertaining enough, and their clever ploy of throwing tacks on the floor, that ultimately disables the bare-footed assailants, is original but is perhaps better suited to a Looney Tunes cartoon than a Laurel and Hardy comedy. The Los Angeles Record, Thursday 17th December, described it in a fittingly corny way:

“They finally win the war against the “Riff-raffs” by scattering tacks in the barefooted trail of the desert warriors, and they are de-feeted” (pause for the groan! Ed.).

The final payoff gag comes as the Chief of the Riff-Raff, played by director James W. Horne, is captured by the legionnaires, only to reveal that he also has a photograph of Jean Harlow too!

Ultimately, any investigation into the background of Beau Hunks can’t fail to shine a light on a very particular and interesting time in Hollywood history. As previously mentioned, praise must be given to Hal Roach for allowing the film to run to twice its intended length, regardless of the negative financial implications, purely to ensure it fulfilled its creative potential. This attitude was also picked up by other studios who hoped that quality would win the day over quantity, as the producers of short subjects were becoming acutely aware that the ‘double-feature trend was threatening their ability to sell their products.

Beau Hunks was a tremendous success at the box office and with the critics. The extended short certainly punched above its weight and managed to win a place as the second part of double-feature programs in countless theatres. And yet, this was the one and only time Laurel and Hardy appeared in a four-reeler, and in fact, they would only make three more three-reelers after this.

Having adjusted brilliantly during the huge transition from silent films to talkies, the honeymoon period for the short subject now appeared to be coming to an end, as the winds of change began to blow through Hollywood once again.



I’d love to hear your thoughts on Beau Hunks, are you a fan or do you think it was a reel too far for the boys? Do share your thoughts with me in the comments section below, or on the Laurel & Hardy Blog Facebook page or better still, join our exclusive Blog-Heads Community at the dedicated Facebook Group.

Please visit and support the wonderful ‘Letters From Stan’ website at and

To purchase copies of all the books referenced in the above blog, please click on the affiliate links below:

10 thoughts on “58. Beau Hunks (1931)”

  1. What a splendid commentary on the film the Beau Chumps tent of Sunderland were named for, one I have been looking forward to reading.

    The info around how the movie came to be four-reels in length is quite fascinating. What this confirms to me is that Hal Roach saw quality as being as important as profit when he sanctioned this for release when only being paid roughly half what its running time could have justified.

    Beau Chumps is one of my favourites too: I love the early sequence with the ‘levity’ exchange and always howl when Ollie tells Stan that they’re “…going somewhere we can forget”. And Stan’s understandable “What do you mean WE?” is beautifully cast aside with “None of your business. Let’s go”,

    And as for Jeannie Weenie: that vampire, that wrecker of men’s happiness. And to think, Ollie learned about women from her.

    Great stuff! Keep up the great work and stay safe!

    Mike Jones

    1. Thanks so much Mike, there was so much information surrounding the making and release of this picture, it’s knowing what to include and what to leave out. I’m trying to make it as interesting and pithy as possible
      and bring the best and most interesting items from the available literature etc. So glad you like it, thanks again for your continued support 👍🏻

    2. Beau Hunks stands among Laurel and Hardy best works. I think that its strenght just lies in its hybrid format, something between a short and a featurette, that makes it special. The great William K. Everson (I love his “Films of L&H” book, also because it was my first book of the Boys when I was a child) often gave unfair criticism maybe because he focused too much on technical aspects: Beau Hunks got all the ingredients for being a L&H classic:

      -It opens with a Babe’s singing number, one of his best.
      – The Jeanie Weanie affaire stands among their best repeating movie-lenght gag (just like Stan’s thumb-lighter on Way Out West) with a perfectly delivered crescendo. Moreover, in today’s comedy standards,  I believe that the Jean Harlow circumstance it is even funnier now than it was back then.
      – It contains one of their best visual gag ever, in terms of execution, timing and idea extreme exploitation: the scene in wich they shows their constant fail in leaving Charles Middleton’s office. A very perfect choreography, improving the same gag they did in Bacon Grabbers a couple of years before. It is worth the movie.
      – Their blind stumbling in the desert storm while the rest of the company solidly goes over a dune it’s cinematographically done in a superb way.
      – The use of little nails as mass-destruction weapon is unique and it’s one of their rare moment in wich they are in total control of their congenital trait of being powerful bearers of Chaos. With that simplex trick they lead that chaos to defeat the enemies and so the order is regained. The wide shot in wich the Riffians twist and turn in pain on a carpet of little nails before the incredulous look of the garrison is worth the movie too.

      To make a long story short, if I ever have to take only ten Laurel & Hardy movies on a desert island, Beau Hunks would be among them.

      Emilio Vitelli

      1. Brilliant comments, Emilio. You make your case for Beau Hunks very well indeed and you’re right there are some genius moments throughout this picture. Thanks for visiting the blog and taking the time to comment 👍🏻

  2. Very informative, great context and useful quotes in this fine blog. Well written and am more aware of the discussions around film lengths now. I’ll revisit Beau Hunks again! As it stands, I recall it fondly. The cartoon like quality of the final resolution of the battle struck a chord…as did the realisation that I’d forgotten the start of the film’s premise, piano playing ‘n all!!

    1. Thanks for your great comments, Richard. I’m glad you found the blog interesting and it has served its purpose to inspire you to revisit the film, with a more informed perspective. Thanks for visiting the blog 👍🏻

  3. An interesting contrast between Ollie and all Jeannie Weenie’s other friends. When snubbed, Ollie rips up the offending photograph in disgust. But all her other friends, up to and including Commandant Charles Middleton, and Sheikh Al-Horne, treasure and retain Jeannie’s image…..

    1. I hadn’t thought of that William Read! You mean, Commandant Middleton and those rough and tumble Legionnaires have more sentiment, more romanticism, more forgiveness in their hearts than Ollie???!!!! Ah, perhaps it’s because they didn’t have the ever-faithful Stanley Laurel by their side!

Leave a Reply